After living in Brussels for eight years, Peter Lenaerts feels he is
getting restless again. In 99, he came to Brussels because of love. He
likes living in the city because its so nothing. Brussels has no
identity; it is an empty container, which makes it a good place to come
back to. He is not sure whether Brussels is his home or not. More than
anything else, Brussels is a place to work and a place to collapse and
rest. When he is abroad, he is much more sociable and tends to go out more
than when he is in town. Brussels as a dance center is characterized by the
bi-annual flow and intake of new dance blood created by PARTS. There is
also an influx of dancers who hope to find a job in Belgium.
Lenaerts does not consider himself as part of the Brussels dance community.
He has never felt a sense of belonging but he wished he did. He thinks the
reason might be that he studied literature but ended up somewhere
completely different. The description he gives of the Brussels dance
community is a grim one: it is a highly competitive and extremely
ungenerous community, a lonely and horrible place with too much façade
where everybody is alone on their own small island and where it doesnt
even take five years before youre old and outdated. There is very little
support for each others work because everybody is too absorbed in their
own projects. The problem is that most people from the Brussels dance
community go to see performances with only one question on their mind:
Would I have done it like that? Since the answer is often no, they
automatically do not like the performance. Lenaerts notices a strange
contradiction in the dance field that he does not see in other art fields:
everybody is very enthusiastic about his own work but people are not often
inspired by each others work. The only things that all those people share
are the money that comes from the same source and the places where they
perform. Although the performance field is a very social field, it is at
the same time a very lonely one where it is hard to have a real
conversation with someone. There is a system of hierarchy, that is to a
certain extent determined by who is programmed and who is not. When you are
not part of this in-crowd, you have a hard time. Peter Lenaerts argues in
favour of more openness in the community, on every possible level. There is
too little sharing now, even between people who work on similar projects
with the same techniques.
Lenaerts calls himself a workaholic. He spends less and less time with his
friends who do not belong to his work world. Working in the dance field was
a rational choice he made. Of all the media and art forms he has worked
for, dance seemed to be the best option because it offers most
possibilities: it is very lively, there is money, infrastructure and
interest. And most important: people in the dance field have a desire to
work. The reason for this could be that contemporary dance is a relatively
young and unexplored art form. Lenaerts personal and professional
relationships completely overlap. Until four years ago, he had to do jobs
on the side to support himself. He does not have to do that anymore but is
very conscious of the fact that his life differs a lot from that of most
people of his age, who have a well-paid job, buy property and start a
family. He does not earn a lot but he is happy and free to do what he wants
to do. His top priority at the moment is to implement his ambitious ideas
about sound design. When that project is finished, he will need a new
thrill. He is a bad networker because he does not like to talk about his
work. In the dance field it has become more and more important to be able
to talk about and justify your work. If not, your work is considered as
intuitive which is not a positive qualification.