When Mette Ingvartsen was still in school, there was a lot of sharing and
exchange between students. There existed a kind of community created by the
structure of the school where you automatically belonged to as a student.
When she left school, she felt the need for a community to continue the
discourse she and others had started at P.A.R.T.S.. Ingvartsen likes to
exchange and to take part in other peoples processes and work. At this
moment she feels part of a community that arose from P.A.R.T.S.. Brussels
does not feel like home to her. Home would be a place where she felt she
could stay for the rest of her life. She thinks of Brussels as a boring
city that is very convenient to concentrate and work. Because so little
happens, you do not get distracted and it is easy to focus yourself.
The idea of community is very present in Ingvartsens work. She likes to
examine the idea of mobility and the new structures of thinking enabled by
new media. She feels recognized by the larger dance community and her
investigations seem to interest others. But most important is her own
recognition, that her work is valuable to herself. That does not mean that
criticism leaves her cold; it does affect her when the people that are
close to her are sceptical about her work. She thinks it is very important
for everyone in the dance field to engage in discussions, whether you like
a certain piece or not.
Ingvartsen feels a strong need for non-productive work. It is important to
exchange without having necessarily a product as an outcome. Not everything
should be instrumentalized for products sake. It can be as important to
produce tools to work with. In her life, the borders between the
professional and the social are sometimes blurry. There exists an
interesting field between the two: the conversations and discussions with
others that might or might not result in new projects.
She notices how the notion of self-organisation is much stronger in
Eastern than it is in Western Europe. In Western Europe there already exist
good work conditions for the performance field, so there is no need for the
dance community to organize classes etc. There are places to work,
residencies and possibilities to get money. In Eastern Europe there are not
as many institutions that organize all this so the performance field has to
set up its own initiatives in some way. The Western approach is much more
liberal and individualized with people trying to make their way on their
own. The trend to be an author producing work is very strong and
omnipresent: the subvention and education system are also focussed on
individuals. P.A.R.T.S. for example pushes its students to become
authors.