Andros Zins-Browne moved four years ago from New York City to Brussels
because of PARTS. He wants to stay in Brussels because of different
reasons: many people he knows (often ex-classmates) live here; there are
many opportunities for dance (there is an interest, a community and
financial support for it); Brussels is cheap to live and is close to other
European cities. His expectation when coming to Brussels was to find a
place that would appreciate dance as a critical art form and that
expectation came true. He considers Brussels as his home and New York as
his culture. He thinks there is a lack of scenes (linked to specific
sub-cultures) in Belgium. People do not relate with each other so much. A
dance scene does not exist either because there is a lack of motivation.
The Belgian system forces you to become very individualistic: to realize a
project and to succeed in the application, you really have to focus on
yourself. Sharing between makers is therefore often project-related.
Zinz-Browne notices a difference between Belgian and New York audiences:
what he likes about Belgian audiences is that they are so diverse. In
Belgium all kinds of people go to performances while in New York, it is
often more of an in-crowd.
His main source of income is teaching English but he hopes to make
performing his primary income in the course of the next few years. His
financial situation is better in Brussels than in New York City where he
was heavily underpaid for the performance work he did and had to do jobs on
the side to sustain himself financially. There he had to work 40 hours a
week to cover his expenses, in Brussels only eight. It feels weird to him
to have to plan his work so much in advance in Belgium because of the
funding system. He thinks the system should categorize work into beginning
level artists, mid-level artists and career artists. For a beginning artist
it is very unpractical to have to prepare applications so much in advance.
It is problematic to have to ask people to keep their schedule free for
several months while it is not even sure whether you will get the funding
to do the project. He describes how (difficult) working conditions can
sometimes turn into an aesthetic, for example in Berlin where the
ridiculous absurdity in some pieces is a direct result of the lack of
funding and je men fous attitude.
He does not have the wish to found a company because he is convinced that
the company model is outdated. Of course both the freelance system and the
company model have their advantages and disadvantages. As a freelancer you
have a lot of freedom and can travel a lot, but at the same time it is a
schizophrenic situation because you have to divide your attention between
the different projects you are working for. A company has the advantage
that the dancers are committed and that they can benefit from social
security. However, he does not think that working in a company structure is
healthy for the creative process. He often sees people in companies getting
lazy and losing the urge to create. Zinz-Browne prefers to work
project-wise, so that he can choose people for a specific project and that
he is free to collaborate with other makers.
The community he feels he is part of consists of his friends (all
dance-related) and people he works with. They share work, invite each other
in each others projects and comment on each others work. He feels a
different connection with people who work in the performance field. The
communication with people who are not in the dance field is always limited
to some extent. He thinks that belonging to the Brussels dance community
also has a social function. It is nice to belong to a group of like-minded
people and have the feeling that we are different than the rest.