Originally from Luxemburg, Tawny Andersen grew up in Toronto, Canada. She
moved to Europe in 2001 and chose Brussels to settle. Brussels was an
obvious choice for her: it was then known as the mecca of contemporary
dance with a strong community. Its central location in Europe was another
plus. She came to Europe because she wanted to learn more about different
dance methods, techniques and ideologies that did not exist in Toronto. It
took her two years before she could actually start working. In this period,
she had a sensation of being invisible. She wanted to work and went to
auditions but could not find a job. In the meantime, she has seen many
people leaving Brussels, going back home and changing careers. In the
Brussels dance community, the law of the survival of the fittest seems to
apply.
People are drawn to Brussels because of the strong work that has been
produced there the last 20 30 years. People want to be close to that
productivity and are inspired by it to create their own work. Andersen does
not like the city and never felt really connected to it. As a consequence,
she does not have the intent to stay forever. This temporariness influences
her relationship to the city and to her life there. It gives it a kind of
urgency and heightened sensation. Because mobility is inherent in the lives
of dancers, belonging is a feeling that is portable. She enjoys being
anonymous in a new city and re-inventing herself. She does have a residency
card, but it is only valid when she is working. For her this shows that the
system is not designed for artists, who often work for short periods in
different places. When she took classes during her first years in Brussels,
she had the sense of belonging to a community because she saw the same
people every day. Now there are too many people in the Brussels dance field
that she does not know. The community has become really big, with many new
people coming in to find work. Sometimes work situations can create a
community as well. Under the most favorable circumstances, the work so
intense, the commitment so high and the shared interest so strong that the
experience creates a community. Andersens social circle comprises people
from the arts community, which is a logical consequence of the fact that
she came to Brussels to work. The larger Brussels dance community consists
of several smaller communities that all circle around different ideologies
of work. Andersen feels part of several ones. She is involved in different
projects and levels of organisation and gets in contact with different ways
of working: the classic hierarchical company model with a director/leader
as well as a collective where everything is discussed together. Both
systems have their pros and contras.
She feels most visible in Toronto, where she is labeled as the one that
works in Europe. Visibility in Brussels can be somewhat threatening. The
Brussels audience is so well-informed and critical that nobody wants to
premičre in the city. As a matter of fact, creators are more visible than
interpreters. The luxury of the interpreter is that when the piece was bad,
there is always the safety that it wasnt my piece. Andersen explains
that as a performer, you can often selfishly enjoy a project. Even if you
are not able to defend the piece, you can often find something interesting
in it to work with. She experiences the Brussels dance community as a
judgemental community that has a tendency to categorize people. She feels
as if she is being watched all the time. In her work, she has a huge sense
of freedom. Her instable professional life gives her the possibility to be
spontaneous and to follow her desires. She assumes she will continue in
this profession, although it is very youth-oriented.