![]() |
||||||||
|
Home About Sarma Critics Sarma-Taz Forum Partners Links Search |
André Lepecki
Intro
André Lepecki (1965, Brazil) started his professional life as a cultural anthropologist writer for Portuguese newspapers and magazines, such as Diário de Notícias (1990/92) and Público (1991-95). Drawn into dance by friends-artists Francisco Camacho and Vera Mantero in 1989 he came to witness the surge of Portuguese dance, both as an insider in productions and soon as a critic for the weekly rock magazine Blitz (1990-1993). Furthermore, Sarma offers essays, both published and unpublished from the whole writing career of André Lepecki - accessible here. And there are several articles dedicated to the writings, concepts and ideas of André Lepecki - accessible here. BiographyAndré Lepecki (1965) is a curator, dramaturg, writer, and co-creator based in New York city. He is currently Associate Professor in Performance Studies at New York University where he teaches courses on critical theory, continental philosophy, performance studies, dance studies, and experimental dramaturgy. He graduated in cultural anthropology at the New University of Lisbon. He was a post-graduate fellow at the Center for Sociological Studies at New University of Lisbon between 1990-3. He obtained his Masters in Arts degree in 1995 and his Doctorate in 2000 both at New York University. In the Fall of 2000 he joined the Department of Performance Studies at NYU as an Assistant Professor. In 2006 he was promoted to tenured Associate Professor. Lepecki has received grants and scholarships from the Gulbenkian Foundation, the Luso-American Foundation, and the Rockefeller Foundation (as a member of the team "Conversations in Choreography"). In the 1980s he was dramaturg for Vera Mantero and Joăo Fiadeiro. In the 1990s he was dramaturg for Meg Stuart and Damaged Goods, and also for Francisco Camacho. He co- directed with Bruce Mau the video- installation STRESS (MAK, Wien, 2000), and co-directed with Rachael Swain the video-installation proXy (Performance Space, Sydney, 2003). With Eleonora Fabiăo he co-created the performance series Wording (2004-6). In 2006 he directed for Haus der Kunst Munchen the only authorized re-doing of Allan Kaprow's 1959 work 18 Happenings in 6 Parts. He has curated events for Haus der Kulturen der Welt (Berlin), and Tanz in August (Berlin). He has lectured at the University of Ghent, Brown University, Tate Modern, TanzQuartier Wien, among other academic and cultural venues in Europe, the US, and Brazil. He was a member of the board of directors of the Society of Dance History Scholars, and of Performance Studies International. He is member of the editorial board of the journal Performance Research. He contributes regularly for several art publications in the US, Brazil, and Europe, including The Drama Review, and Performance Research. Featured lectures and public talks at Tate Modern, University of Ghent, Haus der Kulturen der Welt, Brown University, TanzQuartier Wien, among others. Heis the editor of the anthologies Of the Presence of the Body (Wesleyan University Press, 2004) and The Senses in Performance (with Sally Banes -- Routledge, 2006). He is the author of Exhausting Dance: performance and the politics of movement (Routledge 2006). He is the curator of the 2008 and 2009 editions of the IN TRANSIT festival at haus der Kulturen der Welt, Berlin. His current book project focuses on the relationship between dance, philosophy, and sculpture. TopBibliographyBooks André Lepecki (ed.), Of the Presence of the Body: Essays on Dance and Performance Theory, Wesleyan University Press, 2003 (forthcoming) Sally Banes and André Lepecki (eds.), The Senses in Performance, New York: Routledge, 2004 (forthcoming) Contributions to books 'Margins of the present: a dialogical exploration of the work of Vera Mantero and Francisco Camacho', in Movimentos presentes, Maria José Fazenda (ed.), Lisbon, Livros Cotovia, 1997, pp. 47-58 'Nomadic desire: the surreal dance of Clara Andermatt', in Movimentos presentes, Maria José Fazenda (ed.), Lisbon, Livros Cotovia, 1997, pp. 65-70 'Four Statements of Perception', in BODY.CON.TEXT, Yearbook of Ballett International/Tanz Aktuell, 1999, pp. 114-117 'Still: On the Vibratile Microscopy of Dance', in G. Brandstetter and H. Völckers (eds.), ReMembering the Body, Ostfildern-Ruit: Dr. Cantz'sche Drückerei, 2000, pp. 334-366. For a Sensorial Manifesto (On Dances That Failed)', in C. Pontbriand, (ed.), Danse: langage propre et métissage culturel, Montréal: Parachute, 2001, pp. 161-168. 'Undoing the Fantasy of the (Dancing) subject: "still acts" in Jérôme bels The Last Performance', in Steven De Belder (ed.), The Salt of the Earth: On Dance, Politics and Reality, Brussels: VTI, 2001 'Stepping into blindness: Queer corporeality and the national body in Francisco Camacho's dance', in S.C. Quinlan and F. Arenas (eds.), Lusosexs: gender and sexuality in the Portuguese-speaking world, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002 'Concept and Presence. The contemporary European dance scene', in A. Carte (ed), The new dance studies reader, London: Routledge, 2003 'The Melancholic Influence of the Post-colonial Spectral: Vera Mantero summoning Josephine Baker', in H. Raphael (ed.), Blackening Europe, London: Routledge, 2003 Articles in magazines 'Breaking the rules of presence: thoughts on the New York dance', Ballett International, July 1994, pp. 26-30 'Rethinking words: a field trip to dance criticism', Contact Quarterly, vol. 19 no. 2, Summer/Fall 1994, pp. 23-31 'How (not) to perform the political', Ballett International, Jan. 1995, pp. 15-19 'How radical is contempora ry dance?', Ballett International, Feb. 1995, pp. 48-51 'If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution', Ballett International, Aug./Sept. 1995, pp. 68-70 'Postcolonialism, interculturalism', Ballett International, Jan. 1996, pp.36-41 'Schrijven in beweging: een essay over schrijven en dansen', Etcetera, jrg. 14 , nr. 54, febr. 1996, pp. 17-21. 'Why theater?', Ballett international, July 1996, pp. 12-13 'How modern is modernism?', Ballett International, Aug. 1996, pp. 66-60 'Embracing the Stain: Notes on the Time of Dance', Performance Research, vol. 1, no. 1, 1996 'The Liberation of Space', in Ballett International, Febr. 1997, pp. 14-19>/p> 'As if Dance were visible', Performance Research, vol. 1, no. 3, 1997 'Vera Mantero: The fall of an ego', Ballett international, Dec. 1997, pp. 62-63 'Portugal: dancing without a mirror', Ballett International, Feb. 1998, p.5 'Portuguese reincarnation: one decade, four choreographers', Ballett International, Feb. 1998, pp. 26-31 'Dance of differences', Ballett International, July 1998, pp.38-41 'Rien, pas męme le corps ', Nouvelles de Danse, nr. 34/35, printemps-été 1998, pp. 114-122 'Par le biais de la présence: la composition dans l'avant-garde post-bauschienne', Nouvelles de danse, nr. 36/37, automne-hiver 1998, pp. 183-193 'The dancing book: a portrait of the Portuguese choreographer Vera Mantero', Ballett International, March 1999, pp. 30-32 'Caught in a time trap', Ballett International, April 1999, pp. 30-33 'Crystallisation: Unmaking American dance by tradition', Dance Theatre Journal, Vol. 15, no. 2 (1999), pp. 26-29 'Skin, body, and presence in contemporary European choreography', The Drama Review, vol. 43 no. 4, Winter 1999, pp. 129-140 'The body in difference', FAMA, vol. 1, no. 1, 2000, pp. 7-13 'Wakker worden! Jérôme Bel en het geheugenverlies van de dans', Etcetera, jrg. 18, nr. 71, maart 2000, pp. 37-39 'Dance without distance', Ballett International, Febr 2001, pp. 29-31 'Menial tasks', Ballett International, Aug./Sept. 2001, pp. 4-5 'Geography: Art, Race, Exile, and: My Body, the Buddhist (review)', The Drama Review, vol. 46 no. 3, 2002 'Limitless', Women & Performance, vol. 13, no. 2, 2003, pp. 17-28. (theme issue on dramaturgy, edited by A. Lepecki and C. Brizzell.) TopPoeticsMy coming to writing dance criticism happened in a context of historical break. In post-revolutionary, post-colonial Portugal, the new regime meant the opening up of an extremely closed and underdeveloped society to the world at large. It meant also the coming of age in the 1980s of the first generation of very young artists that had been brought up fully in democracy, and without censorship nor the prospect of colonial war. The country had no dance tradition. Dance boomed in Lisbon with a force that was unstoppable. The New Portuguese dance galvanized a whole set of cross-collaborations across artistic fields between choreographers, musicians, composers, architects, designers. And, with a specific group of artists, the crossing aimed at directions that at the time were not so much explored: between dance and theory, dance and writing, dance and epistemology. When the dance boom was happening, I was mostly outside the fields of the arts -- at least as an active member. I was trying to start a career in cultural anthropology as a young academic, and as an essayist by writing for major national newspapers. I wrote for a science supplement (I had a bi-weekly column on social sciences in Diário de Notícias, driven by the not so modest desire to become the "Portuguese Stephen J. Gould), and for the cultural and literary supplement of a Lisbon daily (I mostly reviewed books in the social sciences, humanities and anthropology) in Público. And I was pretty certain I would eventually do a PhD. on the dynamics of cultural transmission among certain apes. I was also a Junior Fellow at the Center for Sociological Studies at Universidade Nova de LIsboa, with a 3 year grant to conduct research on the sense of smell and its symbolism in eighteenth century Portuguese medical literature. One day, Francisco Camacho, Portuguese choreographer, invited me to join an ensemble he was forming with also choreographer and dancer Vera Mantero, dancer and designer Carlota Lagido, video-artist Paulo Abreu and choreographer Joăo Fiadeiro. This was 1989. I accepted because I liked them more than I liked dance. We had endless conversations. They asked me questions. Their questions made me realize how anthropology knew nothing about art and even less about the body. So, I got involved. I mopped floors, wrote press releases, video-taped endless hours of rehearsal and watched and watched and watched how dances and pieces and performances and films could be made. Then I would give my opinion. They would take them sometimes. I was not called dramaturg. I was called "researcher." An unbudgetable title as far as arts organizations were concerned. Because I had gained a certain visibility both inside the dance community and as a writer in the newspapers, one day an invitation came from Blitz (at the time the most read weekly in the country, a pulpy rock'n'roll publication) for me to review dances. I accepted immediately. I knew nothing about dance. But I think I knew how to write, and I certainly have my opinionated opinions about what I saw on the stages. I also knew that if the experimental and avant-garde dance had any chances of survival they had to pass through the test of being properly accounted for in printed form. My dance reviewing has always been very engaged and not at all neutral, documental, nor objective. I had and still have an agenda. At the time, all was coming to Lisbon: Cunningham, Trisha, Rosas, Win, Meg, La La La, Pina, Monk, DV8, Nadj, Saporta, Valenciano, Linke, Marin, Sankai Juku and so many more. I reviewed most of these people and then the Portuguese. The fact my venue was a rock'n'roll newspaper and that I could write as much as I wanted gave me an unprecedented freedom in style and detail. Those pieces for Blitz remain one of my favorite writings, and coming back to them, I am just amazed by how impossibly gutsy they are. I am also painfully aware of how clearly I camouflaged at the time my ignorance with a fake taste for polemics. Finally, the fact that I had to write dance reviews, gave me a way to start articulating a thinking about performance that was essential to my later work as dramaturg. Dance reviewing is a cynical task. Everyone should do it. Top |
|||||||