Home
About Sarma
Critics
Sarma-taz
Forum
Partners
Links
Search
Contact
 

 

 

Anthology André Lepecki: The Portuguese years

    General introduction
Launch
Editor's introduction
BLITZ Text collection
André Lepecki page


General introduction


I knew that if the experimental and avant-garde dance had any chances of survival they had to pass through the test of being properly accounted for in printed form. My dance reviewing has always been very engaged and not at all neutral, documental, nor objective. I had and still have an agenda.” André Lepecki

André Lepecki has been writing on dance and performance for Blitz, a rock&roll magazine and by that time the most read Portuguese weekly, between the summer of 1990 and the spring of 1993. At that time and as the opening quote remarks, André Lepecki clearly had an agenda: to give a solid base to Portuguese dance to launch itself into the international arena. In his later writings for magazines such as Ballet International, this aim was still vivid. Lepecki’s background was actually that of a cultural anthropologist, and as a scientist he wrote columns and book reviews for Diário de Notícias and Público. The encounter with dance happened almost by coincidence, since a new generation of artists, such as Francisco Camacho, Vera Mantero, Carlota Lagido, Paulo Abreu and João Fideiro, had interest in Lepecki’s anthropological writings and invited him for dramaturgical assistance or simply as an interlocutor (we speak about a time that the term ‘dramaturg’ may not have been coined in that context). At that very point, Lepecki realised there was a lack of knowledge about art and even about the body within anthropology, which prompted him to work with choreographers and dancers, who also were or became friends, lovers, etc. When shortly after, in 1990, the magazine Blitz invited him to review dance, he accepted immediately, and found himself confronted with a medium that gave him an unprecedented freedom in style and detail, which allowed him to set his agenda.

Looking back on that period, several interests came together and surpassed by far what seemed to be at first sight a coincidental encounter with dance. Besides the local boom of dance in Lisbon, important international choreographers (Pina Bausch, Trisha Brown, Merce Cunningham, Anne Teresa De Keersmaeker, DV8, La La La Human Steps, Sankai Juku, Susanne Linke, Meredith Monk, Joseph Nadj, Karine Saporta, Meg Stuart, Wim Vandekeybus etcetera) performed in Portugal, whose work was also reviewed by Lepecki and provided a frame for the local scene to gain a wider and international visibility. This pivotal period in Portuguese arts, and Lepecki’s coming to writing dance criticism happened in a context of historical break, as he points out: “In post-revolutionary, post-colonial Portugal, the new regime meant the opening up of an extremely closed and underdeveloped society to the world at large. It meant also the coming of age in the 1980s of the first generation of very young artists that had been brought up fully in democracy, and without censorship nor the prospect of colonial war. The country had hardly a dance tradition. Dance boomed in Lisbon with a force that was unstoppable. The New Portuguese dance galvanised a whole set of cross-collaborations across artistic fields between choreographers, musicians, composers, architects, designers. And, with a specific group of artists, the crossing aimed at directions that at the time were not so much explored: between dance and theory, dance and writing, dance and epistemology.”

What can then be Sarma’s agenda more than a decade and half later when expressing the desire and need to collect and republish these writings in their original language as well as in English? Why give them a second life in a new historical epoch? What can be the rationale of such enterprise? The struggle of survival of dance through the tools of writing technologies, to which Lepecki refers, is not over. Portuguese dance is not any more standing at the verge of the international scene, as was the case in the late eighties, but now it is standing at the verge of entering history.

  • From its inauguration Sarma has been anthologizing the body of work of André Lepecki, which is acclaimed for its critical and theoretical value. Since Lepecki’s ‘favorite writings’, as he calls his early Portuguese writings on dance, were hardly known, it became a mission for Sarma to anthologize also these formative years in his career. Like this Sarma can present a fuller array of Lepecki as a writer and thinker, including both past and current works.

  • There is an urge to historicise the formative years of Portuguese dance and performing arts. Lepecki’s writings for Blitz are crucial testimonies of this revolving period.

  • International non-Portuguese dance lovers often lack background information on the beginning years of choreographers whom they know from the more recent work that is touring European stages. Thus, Lepecki’s early writings provide a historical framework to approach the work of choreographers that are active nowadays.

  • A new audience of young Portuguese dance lovers, the second and third generation, who have not witnessed the developments first hand, is equally in need of finding information about this period.


    Credits


    Editor Sarma: Myriam Van Imschoot
    Editor Portugal: Monica Guerreiro
    Research in Lisbon: Jeroen Peeters
    Translator: Clive Thoms
    Financial Support: Portuguese Institute for the Arts
    Thank you to: André Lepecki for the contribution to this anthology, BLITZ for giving consent to republish the texts on Sarma, Diana Teixeira (typist).


    The BLITZ text collection in Portuguese and English


    You can access the text collection in Portuguese and in English translation through the following link.


    More Lepecki on Sarma


    In January and February 2004, both Sarma and André Lepecki took part in the event Connexive #1: Vera Mantero, which is documented elsewhere on the site (link).

    On this occasion, Sarma also launched a first extended selection of essays by André Lepecki, which can be accessed here.

    As a contributing critic, André Lepecki has also a Sarma page introducing his poetics, bio and bibliography (link).

    More texts about Lepecki's work in Sarma's database can be accessed here.

    Top


    Launch


    The anthology of André Lepecki’s writings for BLITZ will be launched on November 17th and 18, 2007 in Porto. Sarma is invited to Meeting on Dance Criticism curated by Tiago Bartolomeu Costa and hosted by Fabrica de movimentos. Sarma editors Myriam Van Imschoot and Jeroen Peeters, along with anthology editor Monica Guerrero and choreographer Francisco Camacho, will introduce and discuss the project. What was the impact of Lepecki’s writings at the time? Are there still traces of this left today? How did Lepecki’s writings inform the Portuguese dance scene? How did his involvement as dramaturg and artistic collaborator create new possibilities for critical writing? More information at Fabrica de movimentos

    Documentation of the panel will be made available on Sarma afterwards.


    Top


    Editor's introduction - by Mónica Guerreiro


    "EVERYONE SHOULD DO IT": André Lepecki, The Portuguese Years

    The title of this introduction, written by Mónica Guerreiro, refers to André Lepecki's poetics.

    In overall, Lepecki’s earlier texts – as he himself acknowledges – are empiric, a bit messy and exceedingly brave. The courage it took to write in a style both franc and violent can be seen as a product of his inexperience, though it often resulted in accomplished and inspired analysis and sometimes in blunt remarks with little to state other than his own irritation towards the work. That said, it is imperative to recognise the documental value of this opus: when almost no other media were paying attention to the emerging dance scene in Lisbon, Lepecki’s texts in BLITZ made it possible for many of the protagonists of the New Portuguese Dance movement to be reviewed for the first time, or at least to be so in such a free way – in speech and in space, since he was given a full page (in a broadsheet format) to write, whenever events justified. That – both the freedom and nonconformity of his writing and the importance and visibility dance reviews had back then – are now inexistent in Portugal. The culture sections in newspapers are severely narrowed, radio and TV seldom have insights on art that take more than a few minutes and the independent media (small fanzines, free-distributed guides or internet sites) exercise a rather superficial approach and are in most cases practically invisible. There ought to be less than a handful of active dance critics in Portugal (all based in Lisbon), to a universe of over fifty choreographers and companies, thirty of which with a permanent grant by the Arts’ Institute, meaning they have a continuous activity. Needless to say that a huge part of reality is left unreported and so unheard of for all those out of the close community.

    In the beginning of the nineties – Lepecki wrote about dance in BLITZ between 1990 and 1993 – the scene was youthful: no organised circuit, few programmers, few festivals, very few money, a big urge to make things happen. A number of choreographers, most of them emerged from short careers as trained dancers, were finally assuming an untamed creativity and presenting their work. They opposed whatever institutions there were, and introduced in their movement novel styles and techniques learnt in workshops abroad. The establishment was represented by the private Ballet Gulbenkian (1965-2005), the greatest and most fruitful company in the country, and the National Ballet Company (from 1977), mainly occupied with classical and neoclassical repertoire. Then, as Portugal opened itself to Europe, and later on to the world, prominent choreographers began to perform regularly in a few venues (mostly, the Gulbenkian Foundation, who organised Encontros Acarte from 1987, or small municipal theatres). So, suddenly, Portugal grew in knowledge of what was happening, and so did our artists: as always, only the best survived. The reader will find among Lepecki’s reviews notes on choreographers who have never again staged anything else in their lives: that’s also a symptom of things. But more significantly, the key artists, who came to deliver identity to the Portuguese dance, were already under his focus. I’m talking about Vera Mantero, Miguel Pereira, João Fiadeiro, Clara Andermatt, Paulo Ribeiro, Francisco Camacho, Joana Providência and others.

    It may come as a surprise that the indignation often expressed by the critic about the feeble development of proper conditions in dance is, in some degree, still true today. But a lot has happened since – a lot that did not influenced as much. In 1994 Lisbon was celebrated as European Capital of Culture and in 1998 the same city held the World Exhibition, with the correspondent increase of public funding into artistic events. In the midst of the popularisation of culture, some achievements were made, like the opening of several new venues: but those major events provoked more of a retract on the development of a sustained independent dance movement, than an investment, as money was not injected in stabilising infrastructures but in motivating specific commissions for gigantic productions. This meant that, at the end, as far as working conditions and finances go, the artists were back where they started. They did not obtain any particularly notable status neither did their struggling careers became more recognised by the entrusted powers. But fortunately not everyone was asleep: foreign programmers, as well as some travelled Portuguese ones, came across a boosting energy in their art and made the best at importing the creative drive revealed in choreographies so embedded of Portuguese sentiment (and neurosis) and yet with such a universal flavour. Political blindness – in this and in so many other art forms – may harden the path for artists: but some believe that talent overcomes in brilliance specially if it is expressed through hard processes.

    Art review, when anthologised, can be looked upon as a way to redemption: a second chance to read into the work, to recall its eco, to build up a bridge with our time, in this case some fifteen years later, and acknowledge its multiple dimensions. Be it to conclude that art is cyclical and all things progress into repetition; to melancholically verify that nothing will ever feel as authentic as in those days; or to confirm that ours is the time when the good stuff happens. Be as it may, we have a possibility of looking at dance today with a perspective, with a sense of historical reflection. André Lepecki’s confessed proximity with the dance scene provided him with a particular nerve, an appetite for intrepid opinion above critical analysis and a youthfulness in manner. Truth be told, so were many of the artists he reviewed.

    Mónica Guerreiro is a freelance journalist and writer, specializing in performance arts, also currently working as a consultant in the cultural field. In 2006 she published Olga Roriz, a biography of the renowned Portuguese choreographer. She was the staff dance and theatre critic in BLITZ between 1999 and 2003.

    Top





  •